Synthesizing Customized Planners from Specifications

TL;DR

This paper explores automatically synthesizing domain-specific planners from a declarative planning theory and control knowledge using software synthesis tools, demonstrating improved performance over classical methods.

Contribution

It introduces the CLAY architecture that semi-automatically synthesizes domain-customized planners using the KIDS system and declarative planning theories.

Findings

Synthesized planners outperform classical refinement planners.

The approach reduces customization costs compared to conventional methods.

Demonstrates feasibility of automatic planner synthesis from declarative specifications.

Abstract

Existing plan synthesis approaches in artificial intelligence fall into two categories -- domain independent and domain dependent. The domain independent approaches are applicable across a variety of domains, but may not be very efficient in any one given domain. The domain dependent approaches need to be (re)designed for each domain separately, but can be very efficient in the domain for which they are designed. One enticing alternative to these approaches is to automatically synthesize domain independent planners given the knowledge about the domain and the theory of planning. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using existing automated software synthesis tools to support such synthesis. Specifically, we describe an architecture called CLAY in which the Kestrel Interactive Development System (KIDS) is used to derive a domain-customized planner through a semi-automatic combination of a declarative theory of planning, and the declarative control knowledge specific to a given domain, to semi-automatically combine them to derive domain-customized planners. We discuss what it means to write a declarative theory of planning and control knowledge for KIDS, and illustrate our approach by generating a class of domain-specific planners using state space refinements. Our experiments show that the synthesized planners can outperform classical refinement planners (implemented as instantiations of UCP, Kambhampati & Srivastava, 1995), using the same control knowledge. We will contrast the costs and benefits of the synthesis approach with conventional methods for customizing domain independent planners.