The Impact of CSI and Power Allocation on Relay Channel Capacity and Cooperation Strategies
Chris T. K. Ng, Andrea J. Goldsmith

TL;DR
This paper compares capacity gains from transmitter and receiver cooperation in relay networks under various CSI and power allocation scenarios, highlighting conditions for optimal capacity improvements and the importance of CSI and power strategies.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of how CSI and power allocation influence the effectiveness of transmitter versus receiver cooperation in relay channels.
Findings
Transmitter cooperation outperforms receiver cooperation with full CSI and equal power.
Optimal power allocation with CSIR favors receiver cooperation, which offers no capacity gain otherwise.
Decode-and-forward approaches nearly reach capacity bounds under full CSI and optimal power.
Abstract
Capacity gains from transmitter and receiver cooperation are compared in a relay network where the cooperating nodes are close together. Under quasi-static phase fading, when all nodes have equal average transmit power along with full channel state information (CSI), it is shown that transmitter cooperation outperforms receiver cooperation, whereas the opposite is true when power is optimally allocated among the cooperating nodes but only CSI at the receiver (CSIR) is available. When the nodes have equal power with CSIR only, cooperative schemes are shown to offer no capacity improvement over non-cooperation under the same network power constraint. When the system is under optimal power allocation with full CSI, the decode-and-forward transmitter cooperation rate is close to its cut-set capacity upper bound, and outperforms compress-and-forward receiver cooperation. Under fast Rayleigh…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
