Positional Determinacy of Games with Infinitely Many Priorities
Erich Graedel, Igor Walukiewicz

TL;DR
This paper extends the theory of positional determinacy from finite to infinite priority games, showing that min-parity games over omega are positionally determined, unlike other infinitary Muller conditions.
Contribution
It proves that min-parity games with priorities in omega are positionally determined, identifying this as the only infinitary Muller condition with this property.
Findings
Min-parity games over omega are positionally determined.
Other infinitary Muller conditions generally require infinite memory strategies.
Min-parity over omega uniquely guarantees positional determinacy among infinitary Muller conditions.
Abstract
We study two-player games of infinite duration that are played on finite or infinite game graphs. A winning strategy for such a game is positional if it only depends on the current position, and not on the history of the play. A game is positionally determined if, from each position, one of the two players has a positional winning strategy. The theory of such games is well studied for winning conditions that are defined in terms of a mapping that assigns to each position a priority from a finite set. Specifically, in Muller games the winner of a play is determined by the set of those priorities that have been seen infinitely often; an important special case are parity games where the least (or greatest) priority occurring infinitely often determines the winner. It is well-known that parity games are positionally determined whereas Muller games are determined via finite-memory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
