Challenging the principle of compositionality in interpreting natural language texts
Fran\c{c}oise Gayral (LIPN), Daniel Kayser (LIPN), Fran\c{c}ois L\'evy, (LIPN)

TL;DR
This paper critiques the principle of compositionality in natural language interpretation, highlighting its limitations and proposing a more radical alternative approach for understanding language.
Contribution
It challenges the traditional compositionality hypothesis and introduces a novel, more radical approach to interpreting natural language texts.
Findings
Compositionality faces significant interpretative problems.
A radical alternative approach is proposed.
Traditional methods may be insufficient for complex language understanding.
Abstract
The paper aims at emphasizing that, even relaxed, the hypothesis of compositionality has to face many problems when used for interpreting natural language texts. Rather than fixing these problems within the compositional framework, we believe that a more radical change is necessary, and propose another approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicslinguistics and terminology studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Translation Studies and Practices
