Logical settings for concept learning from incomplete examples in First Order Logic
Dominique Bouthinon (LIPN), Henry Soldano (LIPN), V\'eronique Ventos, (LRI)

TL;DR
This paper explores how logical concept learning can be adapted to handle incomplete data, proposing new formal settings and methods for learning from uncertain or partial examples in relational representations.
Contribution
It introduces the 'learning from possibilities' and 'assumption-based learning' frameworks to address data incompleteness in logical concept learning.
Findings
Formalizes incomplete data handling in logical learning
Proposes 'learning from possibilities' framework
Illustrates with RNA secondary structure prediction
Abstract
We investigate here concept learning from incomplete examples. Our first purpose is to discuss to what extent logical learning settings have to be modified in order to cope with data incompleteness. More precisely we are interested in extending the learning from interpretations setting introduced by L. De Raedt that extends to relational representations the classical propositional (or attribute-value) concept learning from examples framework. We are inspired here by ideas presented by H. Hirsh in a work extending the Version space inductive paradigm to incomplete data. H. Hirsh proposes to slightly modify the notion of solution when dealing with incomplete examples: a solution has to be a hypothesis compatible with all pieces of information concerning the examples. We identify two main classes of incompleteness. First, uncertainty deals with our state of knowledge concerning an example.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
