Raisonner avec des diagrammes : perspectives cognitives et computationnelles
Catherine Recanati (LIPN)

TL;DR
This paper advocates for the integration of diagrams into inferential knowledge systems, highlighting their historical significance, unique characteristics, and potential to complement linguistic representations.
Contribution
It provides a historical overview and argues for the renewed use of heterogeneous systems combining diagrams and language in knowledge representation.
Findings
Diagrams have been historically undervalued in formal reasoning.
Diagrams possess unique characteristics that complement linguistic forms.
Integrating diagrams with language can enhance inferential knowledge systems.
Abstract
Diagrammatic, analogical or iconic representations are often contrasted with linguistic or logical representations, in which the shape of the symbols is arbitrary. The aim of this paper is to make a case for the usefulness of diagrams in inferential knowledge representation systems. Although commonly used, diagrams have for a long time suffered from the reputation of being only a heuristic tool or a mere support for intuition. The first part of this paper is an historical background paying tribute to the logicians, psychologists and computer scientists who put an end to this formal prejudice against diagrams. The second part is a discussion of their characteristics as opposed to those of linguistic forms. The last part is aimed at reviving the interest for heterogeneous representation systems including both linguistic and diagrammatic representations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Spatial Cognition and Navigation
