
TL;DR
This paper explores how the computational theory of pseudorandomness enables the derandomization of algorithms and the explicit construction of combinatorial objects like error-correcting codes and randomness extractors, linking theory and explicit methods.
Contribution
It reviews the connections between derandomization results and explicit combinatorial constructions, highlighting how pseudorandomness theory informs explicit object creation.
Findings
Derandomization results imply explicit constructions of combinatorial objects.
Connections between pseudorandomness and combinatorial constructions are elucidated.
The survey bridges theoretical pseudorandomness and practical explicit constructions.
Abstract
In combinatorics, the probabilistic method is a very powerful tool to prove the existence of combinatorial objects with interesting and useful properties. Explicit constructions of objects with such properties are often very difficult, or unknown. In computer science, probabilistic algorithms are sometimes simpler and more efficient than the best known deterministic algorithms for the same problem. Despite this evidence for the power of random choices, the computational theory of pseudorandomness shows that, under certain complexity-theoretic assumptions, every probabilistic algorithm has an efficient deterministic simulation and a large class of applications of the the probabilistic method can be converted into explicit constructions. In this survey paper we describe connections between the conditional ``derandomization'' results of the computational theory of pseudorandomness and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
