Semantics of UML 2.0 Activity Diagram for Business Modeling by Means of Virtual Machine
Valdis Vitolins, Audris Kalnins

TL;DR
This paper formalizes the semantics of UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams using a virtual machine approach, enhancing clarity and enabling workflow simulation for business process modeling.
Contribution
It introduces a formalized, constructive semantics definition for UML activity diagrams via a virtual machine, incorporating push and pull token engines for better traceability.
Findings
Semantic definition is more transparent and traceable.
Virtual machine can serve as a basis for workflow and simulation engines.
Path-based token movement simplifies control node semantics.
Abstract
The paper proposes a more formalized definition of UML 2.0 Activity Diagram semantics. A subset of activity diagram constructs relevant for business process modeling is considered. The semantics definition is based on the original token flow methodology, but a more constructive approach is used. The Activity Diagram Virtual machine is defined by means of a metamodel, with operations defined by a mix of pseudocode and OCL pre- and postconditions. A formal procedure is described which builds the virtual machine for any activity diagram. The relatively complicated original token movement rules in control nodes and edges are combined into paths from an action to action. A new approach is the use of different (push and pull) engines, which move tokens along the paths. Pull engines are used for paths containing join nodes, where the movement of several tokens must be coordinated. The proposed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
