Computing over the Reals: Foundations for Scientific Computing
Mark Braverman, Stephen Cook

TL;DR
This paper explores the foundational models of computability and complexity for real functions, emphasizing the bit-model's relevance to scientific computing and discussing the potential of physical systems to challenge the Church-Turing Thesis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the bit-model for real computation and compares it with the Blum-Shub-Smale model, highlighting implications for scientific computing.
Findings
Bit-model effectively formalizes scientific computation problems
Comparison shows strengths and limitations of different models
Discussion on physical systems challenges to Church-Turing Thesis
Abstract
We give a detailed treatment of the ``bit-model'' of computability and complexity of real functions and subsets of R^n, and argue that this is a good way to formalize many problems of scientific computation. In the introduction we also discuss the alternative Blum-Shub-Smale model. In the final section we discuss the issue of whether physical systems could defeat the Church-Turing Thesis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
