Improved Combinatorial Group Testing Algorithms for Real-World Problem Sizes
David Eppstein, Michael T. Goodrich, and Daniel S. Hirschberg

TL;DR
This paper introduces efficient non-adaptive and two-stage combinatorial group testing algorithms that minimize the number of tests needed to identify defective items in large sets, matching theoretical lower bounds in some cases.
Contribution
The paper presents practically efficient algorithms for combinatorial group testing, including a two-stage method that achieves the information theoretic lower bound for the number of tests.
Findings
Two-stage algorithm matches the information theoretic lower bound.
Algorithms significantly reduce the number of tests needed.
Applicable to real-world problem sizes.
Abstract
We study practically efficient methods for performing combinatorial group testing. We present efficient non-adaptive and two-stage combinatorial group testing algorithms, which identify the at most d items out of a given set of n items that are defective, using fewer tests for all practical set sizes. For example, our two-stage algorithm matches the information theoretic lower bound for the number of tests in a combinatorial group testing regimen.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
