
TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of pushdown dimension, showing it can be strictly lower than finite-state dimension for certain sequences, thus highlighting the greater computational power of pushdown automata.
Contribution
It establishes a formal relationship between pushdown and finite-state dimensions and demonstrates sequences where pushdown dimension is significantly lower, revealing new insights into automata complexity.
Findings
Pushdown dimension is bounded above by finite-state dimension.
Existence of sequences with pushdown dimension at most half their finite-state dimension.
Pushdown automata are strictly more powerful than finite automata in this context.
Abstract
This paper develops the theory of pushdown dimension and explores its relationship with finite-state dimension. Pushdown dimension is trivially bounded above by finite-state dimension for all sequences, since a pushdown gambler can simulate any finite-state gambler. We show that for every rational 0 < d < 1, there exists a sequence with finite-state dimension d whose pushdown dimension is at most d/2. This establishes a quantitative analogue of the well-known fact that pushdown automata decide strictly more languages than finite automata.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection · semigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
