
TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of case-based planning, showing that planning from a single case or a library remains PSPACE-complete, with complexity influenced by case domain similarity.
Contribution
It provides a formal complexity analysis of case-based planning, revealing conditions under which complexity can be reduced.
Findings
Planning from a single case is as complex as generative planning.
Using similar domain cases can reduce complexity.
Planning from a library of cases remains PSPACE-complete.
Abstract
We analyze the computational complexity of problems related to case-based planning: planning when a plan for a similar instance is known, and planning from a library of plans. We prove that planning from a single case has the same complexity than generative planning (i.e., planning "from scratch"); using an extended definition of cases, complexity is reduced if the domain stored in the case is similar to the one to search plans for. Planning from a library of cases is shown to have the same complexity. In both cases, the complexity of planning remains, in the worst case, PSPACE-complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
