
TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed proof of soundness and completeness for a basic fragment of computability logic, a formal framework modeling computational problems as interactive games with logical operators.
Contribution
It provides the first rigorous proof of soundness and completeness for a fundamental fragment of computability logic, expanding understanding of its formal properties.
Findings
Soundness of the axiomatization is established.
Completeness of the axiomatization is demonstrated.
The fragment includes parallel and choice operators for elementary problems.
Abstract
In the same sense as classical logic is a formal theory of truth, the recently initiated approach called computability logic is a formal theory of computability. It understands (interactive) computational problems as games played by a machine against the environment, their computability as existence of a machine that always wins the game, logical operators as operations on computational problems, and validity of a logical formula as being a scheme of "always computable" problems. The present contribution gives a detailed exposition of a soundness and completeness proof for an axiomatization of one of the most basic fragments of computability logic. The logical vocabulary of this fragment contains operators for the so called parallel and choice operations, and its atoms represent elementary problems, i.e. predicates in the standard sense. This article is self-contained as it explains all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
