Spam filter analysis
Flavio D. Garcia, Jaap-Henk Hoepman

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various spam filtering techniques through simulation, finding genetic algorithms excel at server level and naive Bayesian filters are best for user-level filtering.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of spam filtering methods using simulation, highlighting the effectiveness of genetic algorithms and naive Bayesian filters in different contexts.
Findings
Genetic algorithm-based filters perform best at server level.
Naive Bayesian filters are most suitable for user-level filtering.
Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of different techniques.
Abstract
Unsolicited bulk email (aka. spam) is a major problem on the Internet. To counter spam, several techniques, ranging from spam filters to mail protocol extensions like hashcash, have been proposed. In this paper we investigate the effectiveness of several spam filtering techniques and technologies. Our analysis was performed by simulating email traffic under different conditions. We show that genetic algorithm based spam filters perform best at server level and naive Bayesian filters are the most appropriate for filtering at user level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpam and Phishing Detection · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Algorithms and Data Compression
