Enhanced sharing analysis techniques: a comprehensive evaluation

TL;DR

This paper thoroughly evaluates various advanced sharing analysis techniques for logic programs, focusing on their precision improvements through experimental analysis of domain combinations and implementation strategies.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive experimental assessment of multiple refined sharing analysis techniques and their combinations, including new proposals and implementation details.

Findings

Helping Sharing with Pos improves precision.

Explicit structural information enhances analysis accuracy.

Reordering bindings affects analysis results.

Abstract

Sharing, an abstract domain developed by D. Jacobs and A. Langen for the analysis of logic programs, derives useful aliasing information. It is well-known that a commonly used core of techniques, such as the integration of Sharing with freeness and linearity information, can significantly improve the precision of the analysis. However, a number of other proposals for refined domain combinations have been circulating for years. One feature that is common to these proposals is that they do not seem to have undergone a thorough experimental evaluation even with respect to the expected precision gains. In this paper we experimentally evaluate: helping Sharing with the definitely ground variables found using Pos, the domain of positive Boolean formulas; the incorporation of explicit structural information; a full implementation of the reduced product of Sharing and Pos; the issue of reordering the bindings in the computation of the abstract mgu; an original proposal for the addition of a new mode recording the set of variables that are deemed to be ground or free; a refined way of using linearity to improve the analysis; the recovery of hidden information in the combination of Sharing with freeness information. Finally, we discuss the issue of whether tracking compoundness allows the computation of more sharing information.