Clustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence
Johan Schubert

TL;DR
This paper introduces a clustering method for belief functions that leverages attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence to separate belief functions into independent subsets, aiding in better handling of multiple events.
Contribution
It presents a novel clustering approach utilizing both internal conflict and external attraction evidence to improve belief function separation.
Findings
Effective separation of belief functions into meaningful clusters
Utilizes both internal conflict and external attraction evidence
Applicable to complex multi-event scenarios
Abstract
In this paper we develop a method for clustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence. Such clustering is done when the belief functions concern multiple events, and all belief functions are mixed up. The clustering process is used as the means for separating the belief functions into subsets that should be handled independently. While the conflicting metalevel evidence is generated internally from pairwise conflicts of all belief functions, the attracting metalevel evidence is assumed given by some external source.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
