Efficient Micro-Mobility using Intra-domain Multicast-based Mechanisms (M&M)

TL;DR

This paper introduces an intra-domain multicast-based mobility architecture called M&M that improves handover performance for mobile IPs, supporting multiple border routers and outperforming existing schemes like CIP and HAWAII.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel multicast-based mobility architecture with algorithmic mapping, enhancing handover efficiency and compatibility with existing technologies.

Findings

M&M achieves low handoff delay and packet reordering similar to CIP.

M&M handles multiple border routers, unlike CIP.

Proposed proactive handover algorithm outperforms CIP in reactive scenarios.

Abstract

One of the most important metrics in the design of IP mobility protocols is the handover performance. The current Mobile IP (MIP) standard has been shown to exhibit poor handover performance. Most other work attempts to modify MIP to slightly improve its efficiency, while others propose complex techniques to replace MIP. Rather than taking these approaches, we instead propose a new architecture for providing efficient and smooth handover, while being able to co-exist and inter-operate with other technologies. Specifically, we propose an intra-domain multicast-based mobility architecture, where a visiting mobile is assigned a multicast address to use while moving within a domain. Efficient handover is achieved using standard multicast join/prune mechanisms. Two approaches are proposed and contrasted. The first introduces the concept proxy-based mobility, while the other uses algorithmic mapping to obtain the multicast address of visiting mobiles. We show that the algorithmic mapping approach has several advantages over the proxy approach, and provide mechanisms to support it. Network simulation (using NS-2) is used to evaluate our scheme and compare it to other routing-based micro-mobility schemes - CIP and HAWAII. The proactive handover results show that both M&M and CIP shows low handoff delay and packet reordering depth as compared to HAWAII. The reason for M&M's comparable performance with CIP is that both use bi-cast in proactive handover. The M&M, however, handles multiple border routers in a domain, where CIP fails. We also provide a handover algorithm leveraging the proactive path setup capability of M&M, which is expected to outperform CIP in case of reactive handover.