Qualitative Analysis of Correspondence for Experimental Algorithmics
Chris Bailey-Kellogg, Naren Ramakrishnan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a multi-level qualitative analysis mechanism for correspondence in spatial datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in experimental algorithmics applications like matrix spectral analysis and Jordan form assessment.
Contribution
It presents a novel multi-level mechanism that uses domain knowledge to analyze correspondence, improve model selection, and guide data collection in spatial data analysis.
Findings
Efficiently samples computational experiments.
Uncovers high-level problem properties.
Overcomes noise and data sparsity using domain knowledge.
Abstract
Correspondence identifies relationships among objects via similarities among their components; it is ubiquitous in the analysis of spatial datasets, including images, weather maps, and computational simulations. This paper develops a novel multi-level mechanism for qualitative analysis of correspondence. Operators leverage domain knowledge to establish correspondence, evaluate implications for model selection, and leverage identified weaknesses to focus additional data collection. The utility of the mechanism is demonstrated in two applications from experimental algorithmics -- matrix spectral portrait analysis and graphical assessment of Jordan forms of matrices. Results show that the mechanism efficiently samples computational experiments and successfully uncovers high-level problem properties. It overcomes noise and data sparsity by leveraging domain knowledge to detect mutually…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
