What Should be Hidden and Open in Computer Security: Lessons from Deception, the Art of War, Law, and Economic Theory
Peter P. Swire

TL;DR
This paper explores the balance of openness and hiddenness in computer security, drawing lessons from military strategy, law, and economic theory to develop a comprehensive framework for what should be kept secret or revealed.
Contribution
It introduces an interdisciplinary theory combining military, legal, and economic perspectives to determine optimal openness and hiddenness in computer security.
Findings
Major security topics tend to favor openness, such as firewalls and encryption.
Economic analysis reveals market failures in the level of openness in security.
Military strategies highlight the importance of deception and hiddenness in defense.
Abstract
"What Should be Hidden and Open in Computer Security: Lessons from Deception, the Art of War, Law, and Economic Theory" Peter P. Swire, George Washington University. Imagine a military base. It is defended against possible attack. Do we expect the base to reveal the location of booby traps and other defenses? No. But for many computer applications,a software developer will need to reveal a great deal about the code to get other system owners to trust the code and know how to operate with it. This article examines these conflicting intuitions and develops a theory about what should be open and hidden in computer security. Part I of the paper shows how substantial openness is typical for major computer security topics, such as firewalls, packaged software, and encryption. Part II shows what factors will lead to openness or hiddenness in computer security. Part III presents an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
