Geography and the Internet: Is the Internet a Substitute or a Complement for Cities?
Todd Sinai, Joel Waldfogel

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether the Internet acts as a substitute or a complement to cities by analyzing local online content and user behavior, finding evidence for both effects that balance out overall impact.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the dual role of the Internet in urban agglomeration, highlighting the coexistence of substitution and complementarity effects.
Findings
More local content is available in larger markets.
Individuals connect more in markets with more local content.
The Internet offsets urban agglomeration effects, neither promoting nor discouraging city growth.
Abstract
By combining persons around the world into a single market, the Internet may serve as a substitute for urban agglomeration. That is, the Internet may level the consumption playing field between large, variety-laden and small, variety-starved markets. However, if local content on the Internet is more prevalent in larger markets, then the Internet may be a complement for urban agglomeration. Characterizing the nature of available content using Media Metrix web page visits by about 13,500 households, we document that substantially more online local content is available in larger markets. Combining this with CPS Internet use data, we find statistically significant direct evidence of both complementarity and substitutability: Individuals are more likely to connect in markets with more local online content; and holding local online content constant, are less likely to connect in larger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRegional Economics and Spatial Analysis · Media Influence and Politics
