Ranking suspected answers to natural language questions using predictive annotation
Dragomir R. Radev (University of Michigan), John Prager (IBM TJ Watson, Research Center), Valerie Samn (Teachers College, Columbia University)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel ranking system for suspected answers to natural language questions, utilizing predictive annotation to improve passage analysis and ranking accuracy, evaluated through TREC Q&A benchmarks.
Contribution
The paper presents a new predictive annotation technique for processing and ranking answer passages in natural language question answering systems.
Findings
Effective ranking of answer passages demonstrated in TREC Q&A evaluation.
Predictive annotation improves the relevance of retrieved answers.
System outperforms baseline methods in answer ranking accuracy.
Abstract
In this paper, we describe a system to rank suspected answers to natural language questions. We process both corpus and query using a new technique, predictive annotation, which augments phrases in texts with labels anticipating their being targets of certain kinds of questions. Given a natural language question, an IR system returns a set of matching passages, which are then analyzed and ranked according to various criteria described in this paper. We provide an evaluation of the techniques based on results from the TREC Q&A evaluation in which our system participated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducational Technology and Assessment · Expert finding and Q&A systems
