A flexible framework for defeasible logics
G. Antoniou, D. Billigton, G. Governatori, M.J. Maher

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified, flexible framework for defeasible logics using logic meta-programs, enabling easier combination of different logics that adhere to a strong negation principle.
Contribution
It develops a uniform framework for defeasible logics based on logic meta-programs, simplifying their combination and broadening applicability.
Findings
Supports all defeasible logics satisfying strong negation
Simplifies the combination of multiple defeasible logics
Provides a meta-programming basis for defeasible logic frameworks
Abstract
Logics for knowledge representation suffer from over-specialization: while each logic may provide an ideal representation formalism for some problems, it is less than optimal for others. A solution to this problem is to choose from several logics and, when necessary, combine the representations. In general, such an approach results in a very difficult problem of combination. However, if we can choose the logics from a uniform framework then the problem of combining them is greatly simplified. In this paper, we develop such a framework for defeasible logics. It supports all defeasible logics that satisfy a strong negation principle. We use logic meta-programs as the basis for the framework.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Semantic Web and Ontologies
