Minimum Description Length and Compositionality
Wlodek Zadrozny

TL;DR
This paper introduces a non-vacuous, principled definition of compositionality based on minimum description length, enabling better distinction and comparison of semantic functions in natural language understanding.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, intuitive framework combining minimum description length with compositionality, bridging linguistic and statistical approaches.
Findings
Defines a non-vacuous measure of compositionality
Distinguishes between compositional and non-compositional semantics
Enables comparison of different meaning functions based on their compositionality
Abstract
We present a non-vacuous definition of compositionality. It is based on the idea of combining the minimum description length principle with the original definition of compositionality (that is, that the meaning of the whole is a function of the meaning of the parts). The new definition is intuitive and allows us to distinguish between compositional and non-compositional semantics, and between idiomatic and non-idiomatic expressions. It is not ad hoc, since it does not make any references to non-intrinsic properties of meaning functions (like being a polynomial). Moreover, it allows us to compare different meaning functions with respect to how compositional they are. It bridges linguistic and corpus-based, statistical approaches to natural language understanding.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Natural Language Processing Techniques · linguistics and terminology studies
