From inherent structures to pure states: some simple remarks and examples

TL;DR

This paper examines the concepts of pure states and inherent structures in spin systems, highlighting their differences, relationships, and relevance in finite-dimensional glassy systems through analytical models and theoretical discussion.

Contribution

It clarifies the distinction and connection between pure states and inherent structures, providing exact solutions and analysis in simplified models.

Findings

Pure states and inherent structures coincide in mean-field models with infinite connectivity.

In a solvable 1D model, pure states and inherent structures differ.

Analysis of TAP equations links pure states to k-spin flip stable configurations.

Abstract

The notions of pure states and inherent structures, i.e. stable configurations against 1-spin flip are discussed. We explain why these different concepts accidentally coincide in mean-field models with infinite connectivity and present an exactly solvable unidimensional model where they do not. At zero temperature pure states are to some extent related to k-spin flip stable configurations with k going to infinity after the thermodynamical limit has been taken. This relationship is supported by an explicit analysis of the TAP equations and calculation of the number of pure states and k-spin flips stable configurations in a mean-field model with finite couplings. Finally we discuss the relevance of the concepts of pure states and inherent structures in finite dimensional glassy systems.