Fragile vs strong liquids: a saddles ruled scenario
Andrea Cavagna

TL;DR
This paper explains the differing behaviors of fragile and strong liquids using an energy landscape approach, proposing two diffusion mechanisms related to saddle points and predicting a fragile-to-strong crossover at lower temperatures.
Contribution
It introduces a saddle-based scenario that unifies the understanding of fragile and strong liquids and predicts a crossover phenomenon.
Findings
Two diffusion mechanisms associated with energy landscape saddles.
Reproduction of fragile and strong liquid behaviors.
Prediction of fragile-to-strong crossover at lower temperatures.
Abstract
In the context of the energy landscape description of supercooled liquids, we propose an explanation for the different behaviour of fragile and strong liquids. Above the Goldstein crossover temperature Tx, diffusion is interpreted as a motion in the phase space among unstable stationary points of the potential energy, that is among saddles. In this way two mechanisms of diffusion arise: mechanism A takes place when the system crosses potential energy barriers along stable uphill directions, while mechanism B consists in finding unstable downhill directions out of a saddle. Depending on the mutual value of the efficiency temperatures of A and B, we obtain two very different behaviours of the viscosity, reproducing the usual classification of liquids in fragile and strong. Moreover, this scenario very naturally predicts the possibility of a fragile-to-strong crossover when lowering the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
