Relationship Between Conductivity and Phase Coherence Length in Cuprates
C. C. Almasan, G. A. Levin, E. Cimpoiasu, T. Stein, C. L. Zhang, M. C., Deandrade, M. B. Maple, Hong Zheng, A. P. Paulikas, and B. W. Veal

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the resistive anisotropy in cuprates relates to phase coherence lengths, revealing a universal behavior in hole-doped samples and a crossover in electron-doped ones, enhancing understanding of their normal state conductivity.
Contribution
It demonstrates that resistive anisotropy is governed by phase coherence lengths and introduces a universal function describing in-plane conductivity across different doping levels.
Findings
Resistive anisotropy relates to phase coherence lengths in cuprates.
Universal function describes in-plane conductivity in hole-doped cuprates.
Crossover from incoherent to coherent c-axis transport in electron-doped cuprates.
Abstract
The large () and strongly temperature dependent resistive anisotropy of cuprates perhaps holds the key to understanding their normal state in-plane and out-of-plane conductivities. It can be shown that is determined by the ratio of the phase coherence lengths in the respective directions: . In layered crystals in which the out-of-plane transport is incoherent, is fixed, equal to the interlayer spacing. As a result, the T-dependence of is determined by that of , and vice versa, the in-plane phase coherence length can be obtained directly by measuring the resistive anisotropy. We present data for hole-doped () and () and show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
