Comment on "Photonic Band Gaps: Noncommuting Limits and the 'Acoustic Band'"
P. Halevi, A.A. Krokhin, J. Arriaga

TL;DR
This paper clarifies that static and quasistatic approaches yield identical results for the effective dielectric constant in 2D photonic crystals at high dielectric limits, correcting previous claims.
Contribution
It demonstrates that static and quasistatic methods converge in the high dielectric limit, challenging prior assertions of their divergence.
Findings
Static and quasistatic approaches agree at high dielectric constants.
Corrects previous claims about differences in these approaches.
Provides insight into effective dielectric constant calculations.
Abstract
This Comment concerns the effective dielectric constant for 2D photonic crystal. We show that even in the limit of very high dielectric constant of photonic crystal's "atoms", static and quasistatic approaches give the same results, unlike it was claimed by Nicorovichi et al, PRL, 75, 1507 (1995).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotonic Crystals and Applications · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
