Where is 99% of the condensation energy of Tl_2Ba_2CuO_y coming from?
J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

TL;DR
This paper explains the source of 99% of the condensation energy in Tl_2Ba_2CuO_y, attributing it to in-plane kinetic energy changes, beyond Anderson's interlayer tunneling model.
Contribution
It introduces a new explanation for the majority of the condensation energy, emphasizing in-plane kinetic energy gain during superconductivity in Tl_2Ba_2CuO_y.
Findings
Anderson's model accounts for 1% of the energy
Predicted in-plane kinetic energy gain of 1-3 meV per planar oxygen
Effect may be detectable in underdoped dirty samples
Abstract
Anderson's interlayer tunneling model can account for up to 1% of the condensation energy of Tl_2Ba_2CuO_y. Here we account for the remaining 99%. We predict an in-plane kinetic energy gain of 1 to 3 meV per planar oxygen in the optimally doped material when it goes superconducting. It is suggested that the effect may be most easily detected in underdoped dirty samples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
