B(H) Constitutive Relations Near H_c1 in Disordered Superconductors
Raphael A. Lehrer, David R. Nelson

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how the magnetic induction versus applied field relation near H_c1 in disordered Type II superconductors varies with different types of quenched disorder, revealing significant deviations from the traditional Abrikosov result.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive, disorder-dependent characterization of the B-H constitutive relation near H_c1, extending previous results to various disorder types and dimensions.
Findings
Point disorder in 3D leads to B ~ (H - H_c1)^{3/2}.
Point disorder in 2D results in B ~ (H - H_c1).
Columnar disorder causes exponential B ~ exp[-C / (H - H_c1)] in 3D.
Abstract
We provide a self-contained account of the B vs. H constitutive relation near H_c1 in Type II superconductors with various types of quenched random disorder. The traditional Abrikosov result B ~ [ln (H - H_c1)]^{-2}, valid in the absence of disorder and thermal fluctuations, changes significantly in the presence of disorder. Moreover, the constitutive relations will depend strongly on the type of disorder. In the presence of point disorder, B ~ (H - H_c1)^{3/2} in three-dimensional (thick) superconductors, as shown by Nattermann and Lipowsky. In two-dimensional (thin film) superconductors with point disorder, B ~ (H - H_c1). In the presence of parallel columnar disorder, we find that B ~ exp[-C / (H - H_c1)] in three dimensions, while B ~ exp[-K / (H - H_c1)^{1/2}] in two dimensions. In the presence of nearly isotropically splayed disorder, we find that B ~ (H - H_c1)^{3/2} in both two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
