Topological doping and the stability of stripe phases
Leonid P. Pryadko, Steven A. Kivelson, V. J. Emery, Yaroslaw B., Bazaliy, Eugene A. Demler

TL;DR
This paper investigates the stability of stripe phases in underdoped high-Tc superconductors using a Ginzburg-Landau model, revealing the roles of long-range interactions and domain wall physics in phase stability.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive Ginzburg-Landau framework to analyze stripe phase stability, emphasizing the importance of intermediate lengthscale physics and long-range forces.
Findings
Uniform or phase-separated states are thermodynamically stable without long-range forces.
Long-range interactions can stabilize non-uniform stripe phases with in-phase domain walls.
Experimental antiphase domain walls require physics beyond simple long-distance models.
Abstract
We analyze the properties of a general Ginzburg-Landau free energy with competing order parameters, long-range interactions, and global constraints (e.g., a fixed value of a total ``charge'') to address the physics of stripe phases in underdoped high-Tc and related materials. For a local free energy limited to quadratic terms of the gradient expansion, only uniform or phase-separated configurations are thermodynamically stable. ``Stripe'' or other non-uniform phases can be stabilized by long-range forces, but can only have non-topological (in-phase) domain walls where the components of the antiferromagnetic order parameter never change sign, and the periods of charge and spin density waves coincide. The antiphase domain walls observed experimentally require physics on an intermediate lengthscale, and they are absent from a model that involves only long-distance physics. Dense stripe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
