Comment on "Evidence for the Droplet/Scaling Picture of Spin Glasses"
E. Marinari, G. Parisi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, F. Zuliani

TL;DR
This paper critically examines recent claims of non-mean-field behavior in 3D Ising spin glasses, providing evidence that supports mean-field characteristics through analysis of the Migdal-Kadanoff approximation.
Contribution
It refutes recent evidence for non-mean-field behavior and demonstrates the mean-field nature of 3D spin glasses using the MKA and EA models.
Findings
MKA analysis aligns with mean-field behavior
Refutes claims of non-mean-field evidence in 3D spin glasses
Supports the view that 3D spin glasses exhibit mean-field characteristics
Abstract
In a recent letter Moore et al. claim to exhibit evidence for a non-mean-field behavior of the Ising spin glass. We show that their claim is insubstantial, and by analyzing in detail the behavior of the Migdal-Kadanoff approximation (MKA) as compared to the behavior of the Edwards-Anderson (EA) spin glass we find further evidence of a mean-field like behavior of the spin glass.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
