Localization of Electronic Wave Functions on Quasiperiodic Lattices
Thomas Rieth, Uwe Grimm, Michael Schreiber

TL;DR
This paper investigates the nature of electronic wave functions on quasiperiodic lattices, revealing different localization behaviors in two- and three-dimensional structures through numerical analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comparative numerical study of eigenstates on 2D Penrose and 3D icosahedral tilings, highlighting their distinct localization properties.
Findings
Power-law localization observed in Penrose tiling eigenstates
No power-law localization in icosahedral tiling eigenstates
Different behaviors of eigenstates in 2D and 3D quasiperiodic systems
Abstract
We study electronic eigenstates on quasiperiodic lattices using a tight-binding Hamiltonian in the vertex model. In particular, the two-dimensional Penrose tiling and the three-dimensional icosahedral Ammann-Kramer tiling are considered. Our main interest concerns the decay form and the self-similarity of the electronic wave functions, which we compute numerically for periodic approximants of the perfect quasiperiodic structure. In order to investigate the suggested power-law localization of states, we calculate their participation numbers and structural entropy. We also perform a multifractal analysis of the eigenstates by standard box-counting methods. Our results indicate a rather different behaviour of the two- and the three-dimensional systems. Whereas the eigenstates on the Penrose tiling typically show power-law localization, this was not observed for the icosahedral tiling.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
