The double-funnel energy landscape of the 38-atom Lennard-Jones cluster
Jonathan Doye, Mark Miller, David Wales

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complex double-funnel energy landscape of the 38-atom Lennard-Jones cluster, revealing how the landscape's structure influences its relaxation pathways and optimization challenges.
Contribution
It characterizes the energy landscape using disconnectivity trees and free energy profiles, elucidating the origins of the double-funnel structure and its impact on cluster dynamics.
Findings
The 38-atom Lennard-Jones cluster has a double-funnel energy landscape with distinct minima.
The free energy profile shows two minima corresponding to different structural funnels.
The large free energy barrier causes the cluster to be trapped in one funnel at low temperatures.
Abstract
The 38-atom Lennard-Jones cluster has a paradigmatic double-funnel energy landscape. One funnel ends in the global minimum, a face-centred-cubic (fcc) truncated octahedron. At the bottom of the other funnel is the second lowest energy minimum which is an incomplete Mackay icosahedron. We characterize the energy landscape in two ways. Firstly, from a large sample of minima and transition states we construct a disconnectivity tree showing which minima are connected below certain energy thresholds. Secondly we compute the free energy as a function of a bond-order parameter. The free energy profile has two minima, one which corresponds to the fcc funnel and the other which at low temperature corresponds to the icosahedral funnel and at higher temperatures to the liquid-like state. These two approaches show that the greater width of the icosahedral funnel, and the greater structural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
