Earthquakes: from chemical alteration to mechanical rupture

TL;DR

This paper reviews paradoxes in earthquake theory, emphasizing water's role in fault mechanics and mineral alteration, proposing a multidisciplinary approach to better understand earthquake processes.

Contribution

It highlights water's critical influence on fault weakening and mineral transformations, suggesting new directions beyond traditional elastic rebound models.

Findings

Water decreases normal stress in fault zones.

Water weakens rocks via hydrolytic weakening.

Mineral alteration under strain is crucial for earthquake understanding.

Abstract

In the standard rebound theory of earthquakes, elastic deformation energy is progressively stored in the crust until a threshold is reached at which it is suddenly released in an earthquake. We review three important paradoxes, the strain paradox, the stress paradox and the heat flow paradox, that are difficult to account for in this picture, either individually or when taken together. Resolutions of these paradoxes usually call for additional assumptions on the nature of the rupture process (such as novel modes of deformations and ruptures) prior to and/or during an earthquake, on the nature of the fault and on the effect of trapped fluids within the crust at seismogenic depths. We review the evidence for the essential importance of water and its interaction with the modes of deformations. Water is usually seen to have mainly the mechanical effect of decreasing the normal lithostatic stress in the fault core on one hand and to weaken rock materials via hydrolytic weakening and stress corrosion on the other hand. We also review the evidences that water plays a major role in the alteration of minerals subjected to finite strains into other structures in out-of-equilibrium conditions. This suggests novel exciting routes to understand what is an earthquake, that requires to develop a truly multidisciplinary approach involving mineral chemistry, geology, rupture mechanics and statistical physics.