Reply to Comments "T Dependence of the Magnetic Penetration Depth in Unconventional Superconductors..."
N. Schopohl, O.V. Dolgov
TL;DR
This paper addresses and responds to specific criticisms regarding the temperature dependence of the magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors, clarifying previous findings and defending the original conclusions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed rebuttal to critiques by Volovik and Hirschfeld et al., defending the original analysis of magnetic penetration depth behavior.
Findings
Clarifies misunderstandings about T dependence in unconventional superconductors
Reaffirms the validity of previous theoretical models
Addresses specific points raised in the comments
Abstract
We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Superconducting Materials and Applications · Rare-earth and actinide compounds