Similarity and Difference between Magnetic- and Nonmagnetic-Impurity Effects in Spin-Peierls Cuprate CuGeO_3
N. Koide, Y. Uchiyama, T. Hayashi, T. Masuda, Y. Sasago, K., Uchinokura, K. Manabe, H. Ishimoto

TL;DR
This study investigates how magnetic (Ni) and nonmagnetic (Mg) impurities affect the spin-Peierls transition in CuGeO_3, revealing a universal phase transition between dimerized-antiferromagnetic and uniform-antiferromagnetic states.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence that doping with magnetic or nonmagnetic impurities induces a universal first-order phase transition in CuGeO_3.
Findings
Disappearance of the spin-Peierls transition at x≈0.020
First-order phase transition between D-AF and U-AF phases
Discovery of a new phase with easy axis in the a-c plane
Abstract
We have measured the magnetic susceptibility of single-crystal Cu_{1-x}Ni_xGeO_3 to study doping effects of the magnetic impurity (Ni^{2+} has S=1 spin) on the inorganic spin-Peierls (SP) material CuGeO_3. We observed the disappearance of the SP transition and the abrupt increase of the Neel temperature from 2.5 to 3.4 K at x nearly equal to 0.020, which indicates the first-order phase transition between the dimerized-antiferromagnetic (D-AF) and the uniform-antiferromagnetic (U-AF) phases, as was discovered in Mg-doped (Mg^{2+} is nonmagnetic) system [T. Masuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4566 (1998)]. This indicates that this transition is universal for the doping to Cu site. We also found another phase with the easy axis in the a-c plane in low x region.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic properties of thin films
