Error estimation in the histogram Monte Carlo method
M. E. J. Newman (Santa Fe Institute), R. G. Palmer (Duke, University)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes various sources of error in the histogram Monte Carlo reweighting method, highlighting the significance of finite energy sampling range errors over correlations, and provides criteria for valid extrapolations.
Contribution
It identifies and quantifies additional error sources in histogram reweighting, especially the impact of finite energy sampling range, and offers guidelines for assessing extrapolation validity.
Findings
Finite energy sampling range can introduce significant errors.
Correlation effects are generally negligible compared to statistical errors.
Criteria are provided to determine the validity of histogram extrapolations.
Abstract
We examine the sources of error in the histogram reweighting method for Monte Carlo data analysis. We demonstrate that, in addition to the standard statistical error which has been studied elsewhere, there are two other sources of error, one arising through correlations in the reweighted samples, and one arising from the finite range of energies sampled by a simulation of finite length. We demonstrate that while the former correction is usually negligible by comparison with statistical fluctuations, the latter may not be, and give criteria for judging the range of validity of histogram extrapolations based on the size of this latter correction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTheoretical and Computational Physics
