Comment on "Quantum Confinement and Optical Gaps in Si Nanocrystals"
Alberto Franceschetti, Lin-Wang Wang, and Alex Zunger

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous method for calculating optical gaps in silicon nanocrystals, highlighting the omission of electron-hole polarization energy and demonstrating that including this correction aligns results with semi-empirical calculations.
Contribution
It identifies a missing electron-hole polarization energy in prior calculations and provides a corrected approach that improves accuracy.
Findings
Corrected optical gaps match semi-empirical results
Omission of polarization energy leads to underestimation
Enhanced understanding of optical properties in Si nanocrystals
Abstract
We show that the method used by Ogut, Chelikowsky and Louie (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1770 (1997)) to calculate the optical gap of Si nanocrystals omits an electron-hole polarization energy. When this contribution is taken into account, the corrected optical gap is in excellent agreement with semi-empirical pseudopotential calculations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
