Reply to the Comment of Muessel and Rieger on ``Aging Effects in a Lennard-Jones Glass''
Walter Kob (Institute of Physics, Mainz, Germany), Jean-Louis, Barrat (Departement de Physique des Materiaux, Lyon, France)
TL;DR
This paper responds to a comment on previous work about aging effects in Lennard-Jones glasses, arguing that the proposed scaling function by Muessel and Rieger does not adequately scale the aging data.
Contribution
It clarifies the inadequacy of Muessel and Rieger's proposed scaling function in representing aging data in Lennard-Jones glasses.
Findings
Muessel and Rieger's scaling function fails to scale the aging data satisfactorily.
The authors defend their original scaling approach against the comment.
The comment's proposed method does not improve data interpretation.
Abstract
This is a Reply to the Comment of Muessel and Rieger cond-mat/9804063 to out paper on ``Aging Effects in a Lennerd-Jones Glass''. We show that the scaling function proposed by Muessel and Rieger does not lead to a satisfactory scaling of our aging data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.