Configuration dependence of physical properties of a ferroelectric solid solution
Eric Cockayne, Karin M. Rabe

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different atomic configurations in a ferroelectric solid solution affect its physical properties, aiming to improve first-principles modeling of these materials.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of physical properties across configurations and highlights the significance of second-neighbor effects in ferroelectric behavior.
Findings
Second-neighbor interactions significantly influence physical properties.
Symmetry-preserving relaxations impact polar instabilities.
Cluster expansions reveal key effects on dielectric and piezoelectric properties.
Abstract
In this article, we motivate the detailed comparison of the physical properties of individual configurations of a ferroelectric solid solution as a means toward developing first principles models for these systems. We compare energies, dielectric constants epsilon_infinity, mode effective charges of local polar distortions, and the zero temperature piezoelectric behavior of several ordered Pb_3GeTe_4 supercells. Cluster expansions of these properties show the importance of second-neighbor effects, which can be related to symmetry-preserving relaxation and its effect on the symmetry breaking polar instabilities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
