Development of Stresses in Cohesionless Poured Sand
M.E. Cates, J. Wittmer (Edimburg), J. P. Bouchaud, P. Claudin (Saclay)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the stress distribution beneath a poured sandpile, contrasting hyperbolic stress propagation models based on force chains with elastoplastic models, and discusses their implications for understanding the observed stress dip.
Contribution
It introduces hyperbolic models based on force chains and compares them with elastoplastic models, highlighting the importance of construction history and material fragility.
Findings
Hyperbolic models explain the stress dip phenomenon.
Elastoplastic models face issues with displacement field definition.
Hyperbolic models can be related to elastoplastic models through anisotropic yield conditions.
Abstract
The pressure distribution beneath a conical sandpile, created by pouring sand from a point source onto a rough rigid support, shows a pronounced minimum below the apex (`the dip'). Recent work of the authors has attempted to explain this phenomenon by invoking local rules for stress propagation that depend on the local geometry, and hence on the construction history, of the medium. We discuss the fundamental difference between such approaches, which lead to hyperbolic differential equations, and elastoplastic models, for which the equations are elliptic within any elastic zones present .... This displacement field appears to be either ill-defined, or defined relative to a reference state whose physical existence is in doubt. Insofar as their predictions depend on physical factors unknown and outside experimental control, such elastoplastic models predict that the observations should be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
