Comment on ``Jellium model of metallic nanocohesion''
C. Hoeppler, W. Zwerger

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent model of nanoconstriction forces, revealing a universal force contribution using semiclassical analysis, and clarifies the conditions under which it appears.
Contribution
It introduces a semiclassical Weyl expansion approach to identify a universal force component in metallic nanoconstrictions, contrasting with previous models.
Findings
Universal force contribution of (4 epsilon_F)/(9 lambda_F) for smooth cross sections.
Presence of a hole eliminates this universal force component.
Provides a semiclassical framework for analyzing nanocohesion forces.
Abstract
In a recent letter Stafford, Baeriswyl and Burki have provided a simple model for the elastic force in metallic constrictions of nanometer size. By employing a semiclassical Weyl expansion for the density of states of transverse modes, we show that for any smooth cross section, there is a universal contribution (4 epsilon_F)/(9 lambda_F) to the average force which is absent in the presence of a hole.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
