Comment on "Observations of 2D Polarons and Magneto-Polarons on Superfluid Helium Films"
N. A. Rubin, A. J. Dahm

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent experiment claiming to observe 2D polarons on helium films, arguing that the experimental conditions do not support the existence of bound polarons as previously claimed.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical critique showing that the experimental claims are inconsistent with the physical conditions necessary for polaron binding.
Findings
The experimental conditions do not support polaron binding.
A proper evaluation of the holding field alters the interpretation.
The claimed polarons are not bound under the experimental parameters.
Abstract
A recent experimental Physical Review Letter which claims to prove the existence of the single-electron ripplonic polaron associated with electrons on a helium film is examined. A correct evaluation of the holding field and a restriction of the polaron radius to the Wigner-Seitz radius lead to a gross discrepancy between experiment and theory. The polaron is not bound under the experimental conditions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
