Violation of particle number conservation in the GW approximation
Arno Schindlmayr

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the GW approximation can violate particle number conservation when not calculated self-consistently, and shows that partial self-consistency can mitigate this issue.
Contribution
It provides an analytical example illustrating particle number violation in GW and proposes a simple correction to reduce this deviation.
Findings
Non-self-consistent GW violates particle number conservation.
Partial self-consistency reduces the violation.
Analytical model confirms the phenomenon.
Abstract
We present a nontrivial model system of interacting electrons that can be solved analytically in the GW approximation. We obtain the particle number from the GW Green's function strictly analytically, and prove that there is a genuine violation of particle number conservation if the self-energy is calculated non-self-consistently from a zeroth order Green's function, as done in virtually all practical implementations. We also show that a simple shift of the self-energy that partially restores self-consistency reduces the numerical deviation significantly.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
