Comment on ``Exact non-equilibrium transport through point contacts in quantum wires and fractional quantum Hall devices''
Sergei Skorik

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous derivation of non-equilibrium current in quantum Hall systems, highlighting a flaw in the use of equilibrium scattering matrices for finite bias conditions.
Contribution
It identifies a critical flaw in the derivation of non-equilibrium current, emphasizing the need for careful treatment beyond linear response.
Findings
The original result is valid only in the linear response limit.
Using equilibrium scattering matrices out of equilibrium is unjustified.
The derivation should be revisited for finite bias conditions.
Abstract
Fendley, Ludwig and Saleur [Phys. Rev. B52 (1995) 8934] have obtained an expression for the non-equilibrium current through a constriction in the quantum Hall bar based on the Bethe ansatz technique and the Bolzmann equation. In this Comment we draw attention to a serious flaw in their derivation. We argue that their result is correct in the linear response limit but should be taken with a care out of equilibrium for finite bias. The reason is in the use of the equilibrium scattering matrix in the place of the transition probability amplitude out of equilibrium, the substitution which was not shown to be legimate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum and electron transport phenomena · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
