Reply to the Comment on "Enhancement of the Tunneling Density of States in Tomonaga-Luttinger Liquids"
Yuval Oreg, Alexander M. Finkel'stein

TL;DR
This paper defends the original finding that the tunneling density of states in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid is enhanced at a defect, clarifying that the critique regarding fermion anticommutation was unfounded.
Contribution
The paper clarifies and confirms the original result on tunneling density of states enhancement, addressing and refuting the critique about fermion anticommutation considerations.
Findings
Original result on density of states enhancement is correct.
Critique regarding fermion anticommutation was unfounded.
Reproduction of the original result confirms its validity.
Abstract
In their comment Fabrizio and Gogolin dispute our result of the enhancement of the tunneling density of states in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid at the location of a backward scattering defect [Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4230(1996); cond-mat/9601020]. They state that the anticommutativity of the fermion operators of the left and right moving electrons was not considered properly in the Letter. We show in the Reply that the result of the Letter can be reproduced following the Comment when its calculations are performed correctly. This clearly indicates that the question about the anticommutation relations was raised by Fabrizio and Gogolin without serious grounds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
