Eu-Eu exchange interaction and Eu distribution in Pb_(1-x)Eu_(x)Te from magnetization steps
Ewout ter Haar, Valdir Bindilatti, Nei F. Oliveira Jr., G.H. McCabe,, Y. Shapira, Z. Golacki, S. Charar, M. Averous, E.J. McNiff Jr

TL;DR
This study investigates Eu-Eu magnetic interactions in Pb_{1-x}Eu_{x}Te, revealing antiferromagnetic exchange and non-random Eu distribution, with implications for understanding magnetic properties in dilute magnetic semiconductors.
Contribution
The paper provides new experimental data on Eu-Eu exchange interactions and introduces improved simulations accounting for larger clusters, revealing non-random Eu distributions.
Findings
Eu-Eu exchange constant J/k_B = -0.264 K
Eu ions tend to cluster rather than distribute randomly
Magnetic behavior consistent with nearest-neighbor exchange J_1
Abstract
The magnetization of Pb_{1-x}Eu_{x}Te samples with x = 1.9, 2.6 and 6.0% was measured at 20 mK in fields up to 50 kOe, and at 0.6 K in fields up to 180 kOe. The 20 mK data show the magnetization steps (MSTs) arising from pairs and from triplets. The pair MSTs are used to obtain the dominant Eu-Eu antiferromagnetic exchange constant, J/k_{B} = -0.264 \pm 0.018 K. The exchange constant for triplets is the same. Comparison of the magnetization curves with theoretical simulations indicates that the Eu ions are not randomly distributed over all the cation sites. The deviation from a random distribution is much smaller if J is assumed to be the nearest-neighbor exchange constant J_{1} rather than the next-nearest-neighbor exchange constant J_{2}. On this basis, J is tentatively identified as J_{1}. To obtain agreement with the data, it must be assumed that the Eu ions tend to bunch together.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
