The two-dimensional t-t'-U model as a minimal model for cuprate materials
Adolfo Avella (1), Ferdinando Mancini (1), Dario Villani (1) and, Hideki Matsumoto (2) ((1)Universita' di Salerno, (2) Seikei University)

TL;DR
This study investigates the two-dimensional t-t'-U Hubbard model using the Composite Operator Method to assess its effectiveness in describing various cuprate superconductors, comparing theoretical predictions with experimental data.
Contribution
The paper applies the Composite Operator Method to the t-t'-U model, analyzing its ability to replicate key features of cuprate materials and highlighting its limitations across different compounds.
Findings
The model describes NCCO and LSCO well with specific parameters.
It fails to accurately reproduce the van Hove singularity in YBCO.
A single model may not capture the diversity of cuprate superconductors.
Abstract
The addition to the Hubbard Hamiltonian of a t' diagonal hopping term, which is considered to be material dependent for high-Tc cuprate superconductors, is generally suggested to obtain a model capable to describe the physics of high-Tc cuprate materials. In this line of thinking, the two-dimensional t-t'-U model has been studied by means of the Composite Operator Method, which allows to determine the dynamics in a fully self-consistent way by use of symmetry requirements, as the ones coming from the Pauli principle. At first, some local quantities have been calculated to be compared with quantum Monte Carlo data. Then, the structure of the energy bands, the shape of the Fermi surface and the position of the van Hove singularity have been computed as functions of the model parameters and studied by the light of the available experimental data. The results of our study show that there…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
