Critical Discussion of the 2-Loop Calculations for the KPZ-Equation
Kay Joerg Wiese

TL;DR
This paper critically examines 2-loop calculations of the KPZ equation, clarifying discrepancies in critical exponents and confirming the absence of a strong-coupling fixed point at this order.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the renormalization procedure in 2-loop calculations, resolving inconsistencies and accurately determining critical exponents.
Findings
Correct critical exponents are zeta=O(epsilon^3) and z=2+O(epsilon^3) in d=2+epsilon.
No strong-coupling fixed point exists at 2-loop order.
Discrepancies between different groups' results are explained by renormalization issues.
Abstract
In this article, we perform a careful analysis of the renormalization procedure used in existing calculations to derive critical exponents for the KPZ-equation at 2-loop order. This analysis explains the discrepancies between the results of the different groups. The correct critical exponents in d=2+epsilon dimensions at the crossover between weak- and strong-coupling regime are zeta=O(epsilon^3) and z=2+O(epsilon^3). No strong-coupling fixed point exists at 2-loop order.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
