Comparison of Calculations for the Hubbard model obtained with Quantum-Monte-Carlo, exact and stochastic Diagonalization
Thomas Husslein, Werner Fettes, Ingo Morgenstern

TL;DR
This paper compares Quantum-Monte-Carlo, exact, and stochastic diagonalization methods for the Hubbard model, finding good agreement in ground state energies and correlations, while analyzing convergence issues and the impact of the minus sign problem.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of numerical methods for the Hubbard model, highlighting their agreement and limitations, especially regarding convergence and the minus sign problem.
Findings
Quantum-Monte-Carlo agrees with diagonalization for small to moderate interactions.
Convergence issues arise in Quantum-Monte-Carlo for large interactions due to the minus sign problem.
Superconducting correlations are consistent across methods, despite fluctuations in Monte-Carlo results.
Abstract
In this paper we compare numerical results for the ground state of the Hubbard model obtained by Quantum-Monte-Carlo simulations with results from exact and stochastic diagonalizations. We find good agreement for the ground state energy and superconducting correlations for both, the repulsive and attractive Hubbard model. Special emphasis lies on the superconducting correlations in the repulsive Hubbard model, where the small magnitude of the values obtained by Monte-Carlo simulations gives rise to the question, whether these results might be caused by fluctuations or systematic errors of the method. Although we notice that the Quantum-Monte-Carlo method has convergence problems for large interactions, coinciding with a minus sign problem, we confirm the results of the diagonalization techniques for small and moderate interaction strengths. Additionally we investigate the numerical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
